LARGE MARSHMALLOWS vs HOEST TABLETTEN
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LARGE MARSHMALLOWS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
LARGE MARSHMALLOWS: 4
vs
HOEST TABLETTEN: 0
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LARGE MARSHMALLOWS | HOEST TABLETTEN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 345 cal | 402 cal | |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 0.5 g | |
| Carbs | 82.8 g | 99 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LARGE MARSHMALLOWS | HOEST TABLETTEN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 86 MG | 0 MG |