LARGE COOKED SHRIMP vs WILD ALASKA BATTERED FISH FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LARGE COOKED SHRIMP wins in 8 out of 11 nutrient categories
LARGE COOKED SHRIMP: 8
vs
WILD ALASKA BATTERED FISH FILLETS: 1
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LARGE COOKED SHRIMP | WILD ALASKA BATTERED FISH FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 106 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 16.5 g | 11 g | |
| Carbs | 8.2 g | 26 g | |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 11 g | |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LARGE COOKED SHRIMP | WILD ALASKA BATTERED FISH FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LARGE COOKED SHRIMP | WILD ALASKA BATTERED FISH FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 176 MG | 20 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.7 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 220 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 624 MG | 470 MG |