LANCE vs OLD-FASHIONED SUGAR CONES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LANCE wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
LANCE: 5
vs
OLD-FASHIONED SUGAR CONES: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LANCE | OLD-FASHIONED SUGAR CONES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 494 cal | 385 cal | |
| Protein | 14.1 g | 7.7 g | |
| Carbs | 58.8 g | 92.3 g | |
| Fat | 21.2 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 4.7 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LANCE | OLD-FASHIONED SUGAR CONES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LANCE | OLD-FASHIONED SUGAR CONES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 94 MG | 154 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.4 MG | 2.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 635 MG | 154 MG |