LANCE vs CLASSIC ROUND CRACKERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LANCE wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
LANCE: 5
vs
CLASSIC ROUND CRACKERS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LANCE | CLASSIC ROUND CRACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 507 cal | 467 cal | |
| Protein | 8.5 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 62.0 g | 73.3 g | |
| Fat | 25.4 g | 13.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LANCE | CLASSIC ROUND CRACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LANCE | CLASSIC ROUND CRACKERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 169 MG | 133 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.0 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 100 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 873 MG | 833 MG |