LANCE vs DARK SEMISWEET CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAM CRACKER STARS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DARK SEMISWEET CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAM CRACKER STARS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
LANCE: 2
vs
DARK SEMISWEET CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAM CRACKER STARS: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LANCE | DARK SEMISWEET CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAM CRACKER STARS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 467 cal | 467 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 4.4 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 71.1 g | 70 g | |
| Fat | 17.8 g | 20 g | |
| Fiber | 2.2 g | 6.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LANCE | DARK SEMISWEET CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAM CRACKER STARS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LANCE | DARK SEMISWEET CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAM CRACKER STARS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 33 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.2 MG | 7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 333 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 356 MG | 217 MG |