LANCE vs WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA COOKIES wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
LANCE: 3
vs
WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA COOKIES: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LANCE | WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 513 cal | 471 cal | |
| Protein | 4.1 g | 2.9 g | |
| Carbs | 67.7 g | 64.7 g | |
| Fat | 24.6 g | 20.6 g | |
| Fiber | 2.1 g | 2.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LANCE | WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LANCE | WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 41 MG | 59 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.0 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 513 MG | 412 MG |