LANCASTER vs THE SNAP OF BELGIAN CHOCOLATE IN SOFT AUSSIE LIQUORICE!
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
LANCASTER: 3
vs
THE SNAP OF BELGIAN CHOCOLATE IN SOFT AUSSIE LIQUORICE!: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LANCASTER | THE SNAP OF BELGIAN CHOCOLATE IN SOFT AUSSIE LIQUORICE! | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 393 cal | |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 3.6 g | |
| Carbs | 71.4 g | 75 g | |
| Fat | 16.7 g | 8.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LANCASTER | THE SNAP OF BELGIAN CHOCOLATE IN SOFT AUSSIE LIQUORICE! | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LANCASTER | THE SNAP OF BELGIAN CHOCOLATE IN SOFT AUSSIE LIQUORICE! | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 95 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 548 MG | 93 MG |