LAMBERTZ vs FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LAMBERTZ wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
LAMBERTZ: 4
vs
FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LAMBERTZ | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 516 cal | 448 cal | |
| Protein | 6.5 g | 3.5 g | |
| Carbs | 61.3 g | 69.0 g | |
| Fat | 29.0 g | 17.2 g | |
| Fiber | 6.5 g | 3.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LAMBERTZ | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LAMBERTZ | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 4.7 MG | 3.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 113 MG | 172 MG |