KUNG PAO CAULIFLOWER CRISPY vs BONELESS & SKINLESS CHICKEN TENDERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BONELESS & SKINLESS CHICKEN TENDERS wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
KUNG PAO CAULIFLOWER CRISPY: 3
vs
BONELESS & SKINLESS CHICKEN TENDERS: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | KUNG PAO CAULIFLOWER CRISPY | BONELESS & SKINLESS CHICKEN TENDERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 155 cal | 89 cal | |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 19.6 g | |
| Carbs | 21.4 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 6.0 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | KUNG PAO CAULIFLOWER CRISPY | BONELESS & SKINLESS CHICKEN TENDERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | KUNG PAO CAULIFLOWER CRISPY | BONELESS & SKINLESS CHICKEN TENDERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.5 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 131 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 488 MG | 357 MG |