KIPFERL BISCUITS vs SOFT BAKED CHOCOLATE CHUNK COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SOFT BAKED CHOCOLATE CHUNK COOKIES wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
KIPFERL BISCUITS: 3
vs
SOFT BAKED CHOCOLATE CHUNK COOKIES: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | KIPFERL BISCUITS | SOFT BAKED CHOCOLATE CHUNK COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 543 cal | 469 cal | |
| Protein | 8.6 g | 3.1 g | |
| Carbs | 57.1 g | 65.6 g | |
| Fat | 31.4 g | 21.9 g | |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 3.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | KIPFERL BISCUITS | SOFT BAKED CHOCOLATE CHUNK COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | KIPFERL BISCUITS | SOFT BAKED CHOCOLATE CHUNK COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 57 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.0 MG | 3.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 188 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 57 MG | 438 MG |