KINGS vs DICED PINEAAPLE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DICED PINEAAPLE wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
KINGS: 2
vs
DICED PINEAAPLE: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | KINGS | DICED PINEAAPLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 333 cal | 302 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 86.7 g | 77.2 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 6.7 g | 3.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | KINGS | DICED PINEAAPLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | KINGS | DICED PINEAAPLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 35 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 28 MG |