KIM'S CHOCOLATES vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
KIM'S CHOCOLATES: 2
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | KIM'S CHOCOLATES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 541 cal | 560 cal | |
| Protein | 4.6 g | 10 g | |
| Carbs | 50.3 g | 50 g | |
| Fat | 35.7 g | 38 g | |
| Fiber | 3.5 g | 8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | KIM'S CHOCOLATES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | KIM'S CHOCOLATES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 80 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 5.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 30 MG |