KIM & SCOTT'S vs LOADED BAKED POTATO AGED SHARP CHEDDAR
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LOADED BAKED POTATO AGED SHARP CHEDDAR wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
KIM & SCOTT'S: 4
vs
LOADED BAKED POTATO AGED SHARP CHEDDAR: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | KIM & SCOTT'S | LOADED BAKED POTATO AGED SHARP CHEDDAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 281 cal | 184 cal | |
| Protein | 10.5 g | 5.3 g | |
| Carbs | 36.8 g | 28.3 g | |
| Fat | 10.5 g | 5.9 g | |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 1.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | KIM & SCOTT'S | LOADED BAKED POTATO AGED SHARP CHEDDAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | KIM & SCOTT'S | LOADED BAKED POTATO AGED SHARP CHEDDAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 140 MG | 39 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 1.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 171 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 702 MG | 414 MG |