KAMEDA vs CLASSIC PORK RINDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC PORK RINDS wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
KAMEDA: 2
vs
CLASSIC PORK RINDS: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | KAMEDA | CLASSIC PORK RINDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 417 cal | 571 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 50 g | |
| Carbs | 83.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 12.5 g | 42.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | KAMEDA | CLASSIC PORK RINDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | KAMEDA | CLASSIC PORK RINDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 417 MG | 1,500 MG |