JUM vs MAPLE SAUSAGE LINKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
JUM wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
JUM: 4
vs
MAPLE SAUSAGE LINKS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | JUM | MAPLE SAUSAGE LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 259 cal | 233 cal | |
| Protein | 12.9 g | 16.4 g | |
| Carbs | 2.4 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fat | 21.2 g | 17.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0.3 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | JUM | MAPLE SAUSAGE LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | JUM | MAPLE SAUSAGE LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 835 MG | 521 MG |