JALAPENO BACON WRAPPED FILET OF BEEF vs PETITE CUT BONELESS BEEF BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PETITE CUT BONELESS BEEF BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
JALAPENO BACON WRAPPED FILET OF BEEF: 2
vs
PETITE CUT BONELESS BEEF BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | JALAPENO BACON WRAPPED FILET OF BEEF | PETITE CUT BONELESS BEEF BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 155 cal | 142 cal | |
| Protein | 16.9 g | 19.5 g | |
| Carbs | 1.4 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 9.2 g | 6.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | JALAPENO BACON WRAPPED FILET OF BEEF | PETITE CUT BONELESS BEEF BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | JALAPENO BACON WRAPPED FILET OF BEEF | PETITE CUT BONELESS BEEF BOTTOM SIRLOIN STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 14 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 655 MG | 319 MG |