ITALIAN SUB ON WHITE BUN vs VIRGINIA HAM AND CHEDDAR
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ITALIAN SUB ON WHITE BUN wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
ITALIAN SUB ON WHITE BUN: 6
vs
VIRGINIA HAM AND CHEDDAR: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ITALIAN SUB ON WHITE BUN | VIRGINIA HAM AND CHEDDAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 283 cal | 260 cal | |
| Protein | 14.5 g | 15.6 g | |
| Carbs | 25 g | 27.3 g | |
| Fat | 13.4 g | 10.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ITALIAN SUB ON WHITE BUN | VIRGINIA HAM AND CHEDDAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 2 UG | 0 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | ITALIAN SUB ON WHITE BUN | VIRGINIA HAM AND CHEDDAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 90 MG | 181 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 227 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 928 MG | 675 MG |