ITALIAN STYLE PLANT-BASED MEATBALLS vs GROUND BEEF CHUCK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ITALIAN STYLE PLANT-BASED MEATBALLS wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
ITALIAN STYLE PLANT-BASED MEATBALLS: 7
vs
GROUND BEEF CHUCK: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ITALIAN STYLE PLANT-BASED MEATBALLS | GROUND BEEF CHUCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 240 cal | 259 cal | |
| Protein | 15.7 g | 17.0 g | |
| Carbs | 7.4 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 17.4 g | 19.6 g | |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ITALIAN STYLE PLANT-BASED MEATBALLS | GROUND BEEF CHUCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ITALIAN STYLE PLANT-BASED MEATBALLS | GROUND BEEF CHUCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 91 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4.1 MG | 1.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 380 MG | 268 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 413 MG | 67 MG |