ITALIAN STYLE PLANT-BASED MEATBALLS vs NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ITALIAN STYLE PLANT-BASED MEATBALLS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
ITALIAN STYLE PLANT-BASED MEATBALLS: 6
vs
NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS: 3
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ITALIAN STYLE PLANT-BASED MEATBALLS | NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 212 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 18.8 g | 14.3 g | |
| Carbs | 8.2 g | 20.2 g | |
| Fat | 10.6 g | 11.9 g | |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 1.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ITALIAN STYLE PLANT-BASED MEATBALLS | NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 35 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.5 MG | 4.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 212 MG | 167 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 529 MG | 643 MG |