ITALIAN STYLE PLANT-BASED MEATBALLS vs CLASSIC CHICK'N TENDERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC CHICK'N TENDERS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
ITALIAN STYLE PLANT-BASED MEATBALLS: 4
vs
CLASSIC CHICK'N TENDERS: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ITALIAN STYLE PLANT-BASED MEATBALLS | CLASSIC CHICK'N TENDERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 212 cal | 262 cal | |
| Protein | 18.8 g | 17.5 g | |
| Carbs | 8.2 g | 23.8 g | |
| Fat | 10.6 g | 11.3 g | |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 6.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ITALIAN STYLE PLANT-BASED MEATBALLS | CLASSIC CHICK'N TENDERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.5 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | ITALIAN STYLE PLANT-BASED MEATBALLS | CLASSIC CHICK'N TENDERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 35 MG | 50 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.5 MG | 4.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 212 MG | 238 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 529 MG | 600 MG |