ITALIAN SKINLESS CHICKEN SAUSAGE vs NATURAL CASING GRIDDLE FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NATURAL CASING GRIDDLE FRANKS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
ITALIAN SKINLESS CHICKEN SAUSAGE: 3
vs
NATURAL CASING GRIDDLE FRANKS: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ITALIAN SKINLESS CHICKEN SAUSAGE | NATURAL CASING GRIDDLE FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 129 cal | 301 cal | |
| Protein | 15.3 g | 11.5 g | |
| Carbs | 3.5 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fat | 8.2 g | 28.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ITALIAN SKINLESS CHICKEN SAUSAGE | NATURAL CASING GRIDDLE FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ITALIAN SKINLESS CHICKEN SAUSAGE | NATURAL CASING GRIDDLE FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 694 MG | 920 MG |