ITALIAN DRESSING vs CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ITALIAN DRESSING wins in 2 out of 10 nutrient categories
ITALIAN DRESSING: 2
vs
CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING: 0
(8 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ITALIAN DRESSING | CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 367 cal | 433 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 3.3 g | 3.3 g | Tie |
| Fat | 40 g | 46.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ITALIAN DRESSING | CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ITALIAN DRESSING | CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,067 MG | 1,067 MG | Tie |