INSTANT ENERGY GLUCOSE vs FRANKFORD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
INSTANT ENERGY GLUCOSE wins in 2 out of 8 nutrient categories
INSTANT ENERGY GLUCOSE: 2
vs
FRANKFORD: 1
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | INSTANT ENERGY GLUCOSE | FRANKFORD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 444 cal | 381 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 88.9 g | 97.6 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | INSTANT ENERGY GLUCOSE | FRANKFORD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 133.3 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | INSTANT ENERGY GLUCOSE | FRANKFORD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |