ICED OATMEAL FLAVORED COOKIES vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ICED OATMEAL FLAVORED COOKIES wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
ICED OATMEAL FLAVORED COOKIES: 6
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ICED OATMEAL FLAVORED COOKIES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 417 cal | 411 cal | |
| Protein | 5.6 g | 3.6 g | |
| Carbs | 69.4 g | 58.9 g | |
| Fat | 13.9 g | 17.9 g | |
| Fiber | 2.8 g | 1.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ICED OATMEAL FLAVORED COOKIES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ICED OATMEAL FLAVORED COOKIES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 42 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 8.3 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 97 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 333 MG | 339 MG |