HUSMAN'S vs SHOESTRING POTATOES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HUSMAN'S wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
HUSMAN'S: 5
vs
SHOESTRING POTATOES: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HUSMAN'S | SHOESTRING POTATOES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 536 cal | 526 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 4.6 g | |
| Carbs | 50 g | 56.1 g | |
| Fat | 32.1 g | 31.5 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 2.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HUSMAN'S | SHOESTRING POTATOES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 12.9 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | HUSMAN'S | SHOESTRING POTATOES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 1,000 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 750 MG | 1,090 MG |