HUNTER vs FULLY COOKED BACON THICK CUT
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FULLY COOKED BACON THICK CUT wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
HUNTER: 0
vs
FULLY COOKED BACON THICK CUT: 6
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HUNTER | FULLY COOKED BACON THICK CUT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 588 cal | 429 cal | |
| Protein | 23.5 g | 42.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 52.9 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HUNTER | FULLY COOKED BACON THICK CUT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 42.9 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | HUNTER | FULLY COOKED BACON THICK CUT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.1 MG | 2.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,765 MG | 2,000 MG |