HUCKLEBERRY vs STONEWALL KITCHEN
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HUCKLEBERRY wins in 2 out of 10 nutrient categories
HUCKLEBERRY: 2
vs
STONEWALL KITCHEN: 0
(8 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HUCKLEBERRY | STONEWALL KITCHEN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 175 cal | 217 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 45 g | 56.5 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HUCKLEBERRY | STONEWALL KITCHEN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | HUCKLEBERRY | STONEWALL KITCHEN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |