HOT DOG ENRICHED ROLLS vs SCHMIDT OLD TYME 647 SANDWICH ROLL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SCHMIDT OLD TYME 647 SANDWICH ROLL wins in 7 out of 15 nutrient categories
HOT DOG ENRICHED ROLLS: 6
vs
SCHMIDT OLD TYME 647 SANDWICH ROLL: 7
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HOT DOG ENRICHED ROLLS | SCHMIDT OLD TYME 647 SANDWICH ROLL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 279 cal | 160 cal | |
| Protein | 7.0 g | 8 g | |
| Carbs | 53.5 g | 46 g | |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 2 g | |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 18 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HOT DOG ENRICHED ROLLS | SCHMIDT OLD TYME 647 SANDWICH ROLL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Folate, total | 119 UG | 100 UG | |
| Niacin | 3.3 MG | 1.6 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0.3 MG | 0.1 MG | |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 1 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | HOT DOG ENRICHED ROLLS | SCHMIDT OLD TYME 647 SANDWICH ROLL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 93 MG | 80 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 93 MG | 60 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 465 MG | 380 MG |