HORMEL vs BLACK BEANS SLOW-COOKED WITH TOMATOES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HORMEL wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
HORMEL: 6
vs
BLACK BEANS SLOW-COOKED WITH TOMATOES: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HORMEL | BLACK BEANS SLOW-COOKED WITH TOMATOES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 105 cal | 77 cal | |
| Protein | 6.5 g | 3.1 g | |
| Carbs | 13.4 g | 14.6 g | |
| Fat | 2.8 g | 1.2 g | |
| Fiber | 2.8 g | 2.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HORMEL | BLACK BEANS SLOW-COOKED WITH TOMATOES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | HORMEL | BLACK BEANS SLOW-COOKED WITH TOMATOES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 24 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 146 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 453 MG | 323 MG |