HORMEL vs MILD SEASONED CHICKEN AL PASTOR WITH PINEAPPLE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MILD SEASONED CHICKEN AL PASTOR WITH PINEAPPLE wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
HORMEL: 4
vs
MILD SEASONED CHICKEN AL PASTOR WITH PINEAPPLE: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HORMEL | MILD SEASONED CHICKEN AL PASTOR WITH PINEAPPLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 92 cal | 91 cal | |
| Protein | 10 g | 9.1 g | |
| Carbs | 7.6 g | 6.1 g | |
| Fat | 2.4 g | 3.0 g | |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 1.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HORMEL | MILD SEASONED CHICKEN AL PASTOR WITH PINEAPPLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | HORMEL | MILD SEASONED CHICKEN AL PASTOR WITH PINEAPPLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 8 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 258 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 252 MG | 273 MG |