HIMALAYAN PINK SALT CHICKPEA SNACKS vs RIDGED POTATO CHIPS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HIMALAYAN PINK SALT CHICKPEA SNACKS wins in 8 out of 11 nutrient categories
HIMALAYAN PINK SALT CHICKPEA SNACKS: 8
vs
RIDGED POTATO CHIPS: 2
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HIMALAYAN PINK SALT CHICKPEA SNACKS | RIDGED POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 543 cal | |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 2.9 g | |
| Carbs | 53.6 g | 60 g | |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 31.4 g | |
| Fiber | 21.4 g | 2.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HIMALAYAN PINK SALT CHICKPEA SNACKS | RIDGED POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 17.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | HIMALAYAN PINK SALT CHICKPEA SNACKS | RIDGED POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.9 MG | 1.0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 786 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 679 MG | 771 MG |