HERRING STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE vs ALASKAN WILD CAUGHT RED SOCKEYE SALMON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 12 nutrient categories
HERRING STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE: 5
vs
ALASKAN WILD CAUGHT RED SOCKEYE SALMON: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HERRING STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE | ALASKAN WILD CAUGHT RED SOCKEYE SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 262 cal | 153 cal | |
| Protein | 21.8 g | 20 g | |
| Carbs | 12.7 g | 2.4 g | |
| Fat | 29.1 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HERRING STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE | ALASKAN WILD CAUGHT RED SOCKEYE SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 34 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | HERRING STEAK BONELESS FILLET IN TOMATO SAUCE | ALASKAN WILD CAUGHT RED SOCKEYE SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 455 MG | 211 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.0 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 309 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,018 MG | 365 MG |