HATFIELD vs SWEET ITALIAN GROUND SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SWEET ITALIAN GROUND SAUSAGE wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
HATFIELD: 0
vs
SWEET ITALIAN GROUND SAUSAGE: 4
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HATFIELD | SWEET ITALIAN GROUND SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 286 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 1.8 g | Tie |
| Fat | 26.8 g | 17.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HATFIELD | SWEET ITALIAN GROUND SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 42.9 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | HATFIELD | SWEET ITALIAN GROUND SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 36 MG | 36 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.3 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 946 MG | 946 MG | Tie |