HATCH GREEN CHILE ASIAGO 100% REAL CHEESE CRISPS vs GRASS FED BEEF HOT DOGS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GRASS FED BEEF HOT DOGS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
HATCH GREEN CHILE ASIAGO 100% REAL CHEESE CRISPS: 4
vs
GRASS FED BEEF HOT DOGS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HATCH GREEN CHILE ASIAGO 100% REAL CHEESE CRISPS | GRASS FED BEEF HOT DOGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 464 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 32.1 g | 14.3 g | |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 39.3 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HATCH GREEN CHILE ASIAGO 100% REAL CHEESE CRISPS | GRASS FED BEEF HOT DOGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 6.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | HATCH GREEN CHILE ASIAGO 100% REAL CHEESE CRISPS | GRASS FED BEEF HOT DOGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 250 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 393 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,321 MG | 643 MG |