HARRIS TEETER vs CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HARRIS TEETER wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
HARRIS TEETER: 3
vs
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HARRIS TEETER | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 62 cal | 200 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 12.5 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 20 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HARRIS TEETER | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | HARRIS TEETER | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 33 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,312 MG | 733 MG |