HANS KISSLE vs CALIFORNIA RIPE PITTED LARGE OLIVES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HANS KISSLE wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
HANS KISSLE: 7
vs
CALIFORNIA RIPE PITTED LARGE OLIVES: 2
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HANS KISSLE | CALIFORNIA RIPE PITTED LARGE OLIVES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 166 cal | 167 cal | |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 14.7 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 10.2 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HANS KISSLE | CALIFORNIA RIPE PITTED LARGE OLIVES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 5.7 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | HANS KISSLE | CALIFORNIA RIPE PITTED LARGE OLIVES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 13 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 312 MG | 767 MG |