HANNAFORD vs MAPLE COOKIE THINS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HANNAFORD wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
HANNAFORD: 4
vs
MAPLE COOKIE THINS: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HANNAFORD | MAPLE COOKIE THINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 438 cal | 393 cal | |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 3.6 g | |
| Carbs | 75 g | 64.3 g | |
| Fat | 12.5 g | 12.5 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 3.1 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HANNAFORD | MAPLE COOKIE THINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | HANNAFORD | MAPLE COOKIE THINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 125 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 5.6 MG | 2.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 391 MG | 393 MG |