HANNAFORD vs WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA COOKIES wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
HANNAFORD: 4
vs
WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA COOKIES: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HANNAFORD | WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 481 cal | 471 cal | |
| Protein | 3.7 g | 2.9 g | |
| Carbs | 66.7 g | 64.7 g | |
| Fat | 22.2 g | 20.6 g | |
| Fiber | 3.7 g | 2.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HANNAFORD | WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | HANNAFORD | WHITE CHUNK MACADAMIA COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 59 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.7 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 185 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 204 MG | 412 MG |