HANNAFORD vs SOURDOUGH FLUTE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HANNAFORD wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
HANNAFORD: 5
vs
SOURDOUGH FLUTE: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HANNAFORD | SOURDOUGH FLUTE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 265 cal | 241 cal | |
| Protein | 8.8 g | 7.4 g | |
| Carbs | 50 g | 51.9 g | |
| Fat | 4.4 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 8.8 g | 1.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HANNAFORD | SOURDOUGH FLUTE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | HANNAFORD | SOURDOUGH FLUTE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 59 MG | 37 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.1 MG | 2.7 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 559 MG | 463 MG |