HAND-TRIMMED BONELESS vs 98% FAT FREE GROUND CHICKEN BREAST
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
98% FAT FREE GROUND CHICKEN BREAST wins in 1 out of 10 nutrient categories
HAND-TRIMMED BONELESS: 0
vs
98% FAT FREE GROUND CHICKEN BREAST: 1
(9 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HAND-TRIMMED BONELESS | 98% FAT FREE GROUND CHICKEN BREAST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 cal | 107 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 23.2 g | 23.2 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 1.3 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HAND-TRIMMED BONELESS | 98% FAT FREE GROUND CHICKEN BREAST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | HAND-TRIMMED BONELESS | 98% FAT FREE GROUND CHICKEN BREAST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.6 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 45 MG | 67 MG |