HAM STYLE ROAST WITH AMBER ALE GLAZE vs APPLEWOOD SMOKED UNCURED BONELESS PORK CHOPS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HAM STYLE ROAST WITH AMBER ALE GLAZE wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
HAM STYLE ROAST WITH AMBER ALE GLAZE: 5
vs
APPLEWOOD SMOKED UNCURED BONELESS PORK CHOPS: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HAM STYLE ROAST WITH AMBER ALE GLAZE | APPLEWOOD SMOKED UNCURED BONELESS PORK CHOPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 204 cal | 155 cal | |
| Protein | 20.4 g | 20.2 g | |
| Carbs | 17.6 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fat | 6.5 g | 5.4 g | |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HAM STYLE ROAST WITH AMBER ALE GLAZE | APPLEWOOD SMOKED UNCURED BONELESS PORK CHOPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | HAM STYLE ROAST WITH AMBER ALE GLAZE | APPLEWOOD SMOKED UNCURED BONELESS PORK CHOPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 28 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 907 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 583 MG | 1,071 MG |