HABANERO & HIMALAYAN SALT AMARANTH STICKS vs ORIGINAL KETTLE COOKED REDUCED FAT POTATO CHIPS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORIGINAL KETTLE COOKED REDUCED FAT POTATO CHIPS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
HABANERO & HIMALAYAN SALT AMARANTH STICKS: 4
vs
ORIGINAL KETTLE COOKED REDUCED FAT POTATO CHIPS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HABANERO & HIMALAYAN SALT AMARANTH STICKS | ORIGINAL KETTLE COOKED REDUCED FAT POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 467 cal | 464 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 60 g | 67.9 g | |
| Fat | 23.3 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 7.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HABANERO & HIMALAYAN SALT AMARANTH STICKS | ORIGINAL KETTLE COOKED REDUCED FAT POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 17.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | HABANERO & HIMALAYAN SALT AMARANTH STICKS | ORIGINAL KETTLE COOKED REDUCED FAT POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 100 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 5 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 733 MG | 393 MG |