GUMMY OLD ST. NICK vs MARSHMALLOW SWIRL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
GUMMY OLD ST. NICK: 4
vs
MARSHMALLOW SWIRL: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GUMMY OLD ST. NICK | MARSHMALLOW SWIRL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 367 cal | 381 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 4.8 g | |
| Carbs | 83.3 g | 81.0 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 4.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GUMMY OLD ST. NICK | MARSHMALLOW SWIRL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 17.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | GUMMY OLD ST. NICK | MARSHMALLOW SWIRL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 3.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 50 MG | 0 MG |