GUMMY BEARS vs CHOCOLATEY COVERED MARSHMALLOW SANTAS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GUMMY BEARS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
GUMMY BEARS: 5
vs
CHOCOLATEY COVERED MARSHMALLOW SANTAS: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GUMMY BEARS | CHOCOLATEY COVERED MARSHMALLOW SANTAS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 350 cal | 409 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 80 g | 81.8 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 9.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GUMMY BEARS | CHOCOLATEY COVERED MARSHMALLOW SANTAS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | GUMMY BEARS | CHOCOLATEY COVERED MARSHMALLOW SANTAS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 9 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 145 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 50 MG | 0 MG |