GROUND PORK WITH MUSHROOMS vs 100% GRASS FED CHUCK ROAST
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
100% GRASS FED CHUCK ROAST wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
GROUND PORK WITH MUSHROOMS: 3
vs
100% GRASS FED CHUCK ROAST: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GROUND PORK WITH MUSHROOMS | 100% GRASS FED CHUCK ROAST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 196 cal | 133 cal | |
| Protein | 16.1 g | 21.2 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 5.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GROUND PORK WITH MUSHROOMS | 100% GRASS FED CHUCK ROAST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | GROUND PORK WITH MUSHROOMS | 100% GRASS FED CHUCK ROAST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.5 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 304 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 179 MG | 80 MG |