GROUND BEEF CHUCK vs 100% GRASS FED ANGUS BEEF FLANKEN-STYLE SHORT RIBS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GROUND BEEF CHUCK wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
GROUND BEEF CHUCK: 5
vs
100% GRASS FED ANGUS BEEF FLANKEN-STYLE SHORT RIBS: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GROUND BEEF CHUCK | 100% GRASS FED ANGUS BEEF FLANKEN-STYLE SHORT RIBS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 248 cal | 295 cal | |
| Protein | 16.8 g | 16.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 19.5 g | 25.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GROUND BEEF CHUCK | 100% GRASS FED ANGUS BEEF FLANKEN-STYLE SHORT RIBS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | GROUND BEEF CHUCK | 100% GRASS FED ANGUS BEEF FLANKEN-STYLE SHORT RIBS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.6 MG | 2.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 214 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 66 MG | 58 MG |