GREEN CHILE CHEDD'R SAUSAGE PLANT-BASED LINKS vs CAJUN STYLE PORK TENDERLOIN
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CAJUN STYLE PORK TENDERLOIN wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
GREEN CHILE CHEDD'R SAUSAGE PLANT-BASED LINKS: 4
vs
CAJUN STYLE PORK TENDERLOIN: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GREEN CHILE CHEDD'R SAUSAGE PLANT-BASED LINKS | CAJUN STYLE PORK TENDERLOIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 174 cal | 98 cal | |
| Protein | 14.1 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 8.7 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fat | 9.8 g | 2.2 g | |
| Fiber | 2.2 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GREEN CHILE CHEDD'R SAUSAGE PLANT-BASED LINKS | CAJUN STYLE PORK TENDERLOIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | GREEN CHILE CHEDD'R SAUSAGE PLANT-BASED LINKS | CAJUN STYLE PORK TENDERLOIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 228 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.8 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 652 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 478 MG | 571 MG |