GREAT PLAINS SAUSAGE WORKS BACON CHEDDAR MEATBALLS vs ITALIAN-STYLE CHICKEN MEATBALLS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ITALIAN-STYLE CHICKEN MEATBALLS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
GREAT PLAINS SAUSAGE WORKS BACON CHEDDAR MEATBALLS: 3
vs
ITALIAN-STYLE CHICKEN MEATBALLS: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GREAT PLAINS SAUSAGE WORKS BACON CHEDDAR MEATBALLS | ITALIAN-STYLE CHICKEN MEATBALLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 301 cal | 131 cal | |
| Protein | 15.9 g | 19.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0.9 g | 6.0 g | |
| Fat | 25.7 g | 4.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GREAT PLAINS SAUSAGE WORKS BACON CHEDDAR MEATBALLS | ITALIAN-STYLE CHICKEN MEATBALLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.9 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | GREAT PLAINS SAUSAGE WORKS BACON CHEDDAR MEATBALLS | ITALIAN-STYLE CHICKEN MEATBALLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 48 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 912 MG | 512 MG |