GRAPE LOWER SUGAR THIRST QUENCHER vs PEACH MANGO FLAVORED RESTORE HYDRATION WITH ELECTROLYTES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 9 nutrient categories
GRAPE LOWER SUGAR THIRST QUENCHER: 2
vs
PEACH MANGO FLAVORED RESTORE HYDRATION WITH ELECTROLYTES: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GRAPE LOWER SUGAR THIRST QUENCHER | PEACH MANGO FLAVORED RESTORE HYDRATION WITH ELECTROLYTES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 8 cal | 16 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 2 g | |
| Carbs | 2.2 g | 2.2 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GRAPE LOWER SUGAR THIRST QUENCHER | PEACH MANGO FLAVORED RESTORE HYDRATION WITH ELECTROLYTES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 18 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | GRAPE LOWER SUGAR THIRST QUENCHER | PEACH MANGO FLAVORED RESTORE HYDRATION WITH ELECTROLYTES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Potassium, K | 14 MG | 12 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 46 MG | 46 MG | Tie |