GRAPE FLAVORED LOWER SUGAR THIRST QUENCHER vs REFOCUS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GRAPE FLAVORED LOWER SUGAR THIRST QUENCHER wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
GRAPE FLAVORED LOWER SUGAR THIRST QUENCHER: 3
vs
REFOCUS: 2
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GRAPE FLAVORED LOWER SUGAR THIRST QUENCHER | REFOCUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 8 cal | 21 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 2.2 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GRAPE FLAVORED LOWER SUGAR THIRST QUENCHER | REFOCUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 5 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | GRAPE FLAVORED LOWER SUGAR THIRST QUENCHER | REFOCUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 14 MG | 25 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 46 MG | 29 MG |